Table of Contents
AMRT gets dismissed for one simple reason: it doesn’t come with a law attached.
So suppliers hear “voluntary” and translate it as:
- optional
- low priority
- something to delay until next quarter
That’s exactly where AMRT problems start.
In real supply chains, “voluntary” doesn’t mean optional. It means the enforcement mechanism is commercial, not legal. And commercial enforcement can be faster, stricter, and more unforgiving—because it’s tied to sourcing decisions.
This page clarifies who AMRT applies to and why the “voluntary” label causes suppliers to misread the situation.
AMRT Applicability Is Customer-Triggered, Not Law-Triggered
AMRT is typically requested under:
- supplier onboarding packages
- annual supplier sustainability questionnaires
- responsible sourcing / critical minerals programs
- customer ESG evidence requests
This matters because the “trigger” is not a regulation threshold. The trigger is customer exposure.
If an OEM requests AMRT, applicability has already been decided by the customer’s internal program. Your job as a supplier is not to debate applicability—it’s to understand where you fall in the scope and respond accordingly.
Who Is Typically Expected to Submit AMRT
AMRT is commonly requested from suppliers that touch products or materials associated with critical mineral exposure, including:
Battery and EV supply chains
- battery packs, modules, cells
- cathode/anode materials and precursors
- power electronics, inverters, charging hardware
Electronics and semiconductor manufacturing
- high-purity metals, specialty materials
- components likely to contain nickel, copper, rare earths
- sub-assemblies in consumer and industrial electronics
Industrial equipment and complex assemblies
- motors, drives, automation systems
- electromechanical assemblies
- equipment that uses high-performance alloys and magnets
Renewable energy technologies
- wind (rare earth magnets), solar balance-of-system
- grid storage and power conversion systems
Key point: AMRT applicability often extends beyond the final product manufacturer. Material suppliers and sub-assembly suppliers are frequently asked because they sit closer to mineral decisions.
The Supplier Profiles That Get Flagged First
Even within those sectors, AMRT requests tend to concentrate on a few supplier profiles:
Tier-1 suppliers to OEMs
These suppliers are closest to customer scrutiny. OEMs use Tier-1 reporting to build upstream mapping quickly.
Tier-2 suppliers with material influence
Suppliers providing materials, coatings, magnets, alloys, or battery-related components are often asked because they influence mineral composition.
Suppliers included in “critical minerals” segmentation
Many OEMs classify suppliers into “critical exposure” tiers based on:
- product category
- material declarations
- part families linked to electrification
If your parts fall into those categories, AMRT applicability is highly likely.
What AMRT Applicability Does Not Depend On
This is where suppliers waste time arguing the wrong point.
AMRT does not apply because you are:
- a public company
- headquartered in a particular region
- above a revenue threshold
- “large enough to be regulated”
AMRT applies because:
- the customer’s product strategy depends on certain minerals
- the customer has committed to transparency initiatives
- the customer needs supply-chain mapping as part of procurement risk controls
A small supplier can be fully in scope. A large supplier can be out of scope. Company size is not the gating factor.
Why “Voluntary” Is Operationally Misleading
The word “voluntary” is legally accurate in one narrow sense:
- no government agency is fining you for not submitting AMRT
But in operational reality, “voluntary” becomes mandatory through:
Contracts and onboarding requirements
AMRT completion can be embedded in:
- supplier qualification conditions
- code of conduct requirements
- sustainability addendums
Supplier scorecards
AMRT completion and quality can influence:
- preferred supplier status
- business allocation decisions
- corrective action requirements
ESG evidence demands
AMRT can become supporting evidence for:
- upstream risk statements
- critical mineral exposure mapping
- supplier program maturity assessments
This is why suppliers who refuse AMRT often don’t “avoid responsibility.” They simply trigger a new classification: high-risk / non-cooperative.
The Most Common Misread: “If We Ignore It, It Goes Away”
In most customer programs, non-response doesn’t end the request. It escalates it.
A typical pattern looks like:
- AMRT request sent with a deadline
- Supplier delays or ignores
- Follow-up request escalates to procurement
- Supplier is flagged for risk review
- Supplier is asked for more information, not less
Silence doesn’t reduce exposure. It increases attention.
The Practical Way to Decide If AMRT Applies to You
If you want a fast internal applicability decision, ask these questions:
- Are we supplying into batteries, EVs, electronics, renewables, or industrial assemblies?
- Do our parts plausibly contain lithium, nickel, graphite, manganese, copper, or rare earths?
- Has the customer asked for AMRT under sustainability, responsible sourcing, or supplier qualification?
- Are we being segmented under any “critical minerals” supplier program?
If the answer is “yes” to any of these, AMRT applicability is highly likely.
What AMRT Applicability Means for Suppliers
AMRT is not “optional reporting.” It’s a customer-driven risk requirement.
Suppliers are expected to submit AMRT when they sit inside product categories or material exposures that customers are actively mapping. The voluntary label simply describes the absence of government enforcement—not the absence of consequences.
If you’re being asked for AMRT, applicability is already established. The real decision is whether you respond early and deliberately—or respond later under escalation. *